> | My fix is simply to change that test for tx_packets_acked greater than > | or equal to two in slow start. > | > Excellent catch, thank you very much. This has also been added to the test tree. > > Would you be ok with me reusing the commit message as a comment - or if you > like, you can also send an update. I don't think that a comment is really needed here. I don't see that anyone looking at this code at some point in the future would say "why did they use >= there?" Particularly, since the test (in congestion avoidance state) four lines later also uses >= without explanation. I would consider using >= in this situation (testing for a value of an incrementing variable) to be good coding practice even if it wasn't strictly necessary. Samuel Jero Internetworking Research Group Ohio University
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
