| > Not only are you lacking the courage to admit that it was your own fault | > to pull a tree no one had asked you to pull, now you are trying to make | > me look foolish to cover your own mistake. | | Your subject line said, and it's still being used in this thread: | "net-next-2.6 [pull-request]" | | What the heck should I take that to mean exactly? | Yes, it takes two to make a misunderstanding. And maybe it was me who misunderstood you, or maybe vice versa. Here is my understanding - this thread started as a pull request, after sending a call for last comments about two weeks ago. Your first reply in this thread was to extend the last call for comments, which went on all over last week. Meanwhile I had contacted you and Arnaldo privately to ask what to do with DCCP in general. I had emailed you twice, there was no reply, instead the tree was pulled without further discussion. That would probably have been ok if only it had been the right tree. Since you chose not to reply, I assumed that you were taking responsibility for your own choices. By saying that you trusted me in light of what happened, you seem to imply that all I had intended was to pull a bad trick on you. I am not sure I want to believe this. It is not fair to ignore a private request asking what to do with DCCP and then broadcasting around in public "I want someone else to get the DCCP changes through". That will only solve a part of the problem, unfortunately it is not an insurance against mistakes. Since you chose not to reply in private regarding what to to with DCCP, I suggest that we continue/finish this discussion here - yes, probably after renaming this thread :) Gerrit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
