From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:01:15 +0200 > Not only are you lacking the courage to admit that it was your own fault > to pull a tree no one had asked you to pull, now you are trying to make > me look foolish to cover your own mistake. Your subject line said, and it's still being used in this thread: "net-next-2.6 [pull-request]" What the heck should I take that to mean exactly? > It further did not even occur to you to check the provided gitweb link, nor > did you recognise that you had pulled about 100 instead of 37 patches. And > you seem not to have looked at the diffstats either - what has a change in > tcp_input.c got to do with a DCCP-only patch set? > > Not to mention the conflicts which you silently fixed instead of looking at > their cause. I did look at the merge conflicts I fixed up, code moved from one place to another or got handled by new helper routines which were being called, so I picked the appropriate hunk and validated the build. If I wasn't all that sure of the result I would have replied to you instead saying "this tree is messed up, I'm not pulling" And I do that all the time. The shorter answer is I did my best and I TRUSTED YOU to only point a GIT URL my way that was explicitly ready. Else, you'd say "don't pull this" rather than have "net-next-2.6 pull request" in the subject line. > What you are saying here has little authority. It is just foolish vanity. Gerrit, it's over. The only one in vain is you. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
