Dnia Monday 07 of April 2008, Gerrit Renker napisał: > We are always allocating (in dccp_init_sock and dccp_create_openreq_child), > so why not make dp->dccps_qpolicy a static member rather than a pointer. > Then should I keep void dccp_qpolicy_destroy(struct sock *sk) as an empty function or delete it? Later it might be used to call policy specific destructor, but now it wouldn't look very useful... -- Regards, Tomasz Grobelny -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
