2008/1/17, maillist ifiaas <maillist.ifiaas@xxxxxxxxx>: > Thank you Ian. > If any one has report of such experiments, I don't need to do the same work. > > gavin > > On Jan 17, 2008 2:24 PM, Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Jan 17, 2008 5:17 PM, maillist ifiaas <maillist.ifiaas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi friends,, > > > > > > Where can we find CCID2 (latest Linux release) test against TCP ? > > > There seems no measurement study to validate the TCP friendliness on > > > any existing implementation yet, including BSD. > > > > > > Emmanuel Lochin has did some test before, showing the BSD > > > implementation was not very well: > > > http://manu.lochin.org/dccp/tests/dccp_eval.html > > > > > > Any similar test for Linux CCID2 out there? > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > gavin > > > > Easy enough to do a test with modified iperf. Gerrit and I both have > > patches for iperf to run it continuously, use dccp and select the TCP > > congestion mechanism - use Reno in particular. > > > > I used to do this with simultaneous CCID3 and TCP to see that they > > matched the rate, you could do the same for CCID2. You can use netem > > also to constrain link or introduce loss also. > > > > Regards > > > > Ian > > -- > > Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/ > > Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz > > I recently published a paper with results of such experiments in CCNC conference (http://www.ieee-ccnc.org/) and other results (to be published) in ACM SAC (http://www.acm.org/conferences/sac/sac2008/). Leandro. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
