| I am new of this mailing list and I am really interested in the | measurements you are performing with DCCP. This was more of a regression test, as there had been recent changes in the test tree, to see that the kernel (not userspace) still performs in a predictable way. | Which tool are you using ? Are you using Iperf for such measurements ? The setup is the one from http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Net:DCCP_Testing#Regression_testing and, yes, it uses iperf. | Have you ever heard about D-ITG ? | You can find more information here: | http://www.grid.unina.it/software/ITG | | I am one of the authors of such platform and I have also | performed some very preliminary tests with DCCP. | | I would be very glad to have your opinion on that and I'm very interested | in improving its features, also with specific regard to the support of | transport protocols. | It is a very nice tool with many features. I only ran simple tests with it (version 2.6), again only as basic sanity tests -- the throughput result was similar to the one tested with iperf. I think that the tool has more to offer and can help improve/extend DCCP testing. Here is my list of points, hoping that the others will add theirs, too: * would be good to have a standardised set of scripts, for comparison/benchmarking * the built-in VoIP module only works for UDP -- is it possible to port this to DCCP? * as per previous email, more complex traffic scenarios would be good, in particular - switching on/off background traffic at times to observe TCP/flow-friendliness - running multiple DCCP flows in parallel and at overlapping times Gerrit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
