On 8/30/07, Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A style comment - I like the idea of the extensions and can see your point. > To be true, if the code were analysed for extensions then the rfc344bis-00 > extensions would probably also count, as well as the erratum for the SYN > RTT sample. Yes, that was the intention - to pick up other uses over time as appropriate. > > When using a one-bit flag (which automatically behaves like a Boolean type), > such as > /* @ccid3hctx_faster_restart_on: whether Faster Restart is enabled */ > /* ... */ > u8 ccid3hctx_faster_restart_on:1; > > the testing and setting code would be smaller - if a little less elegant. Understand what you're saying. When/if it gets merged I'll see what code style Arnaldo wants and go with whichever style he prefers. I don't mind which one is used. Ian -- Web1: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/ Web2: http://www.jandi.co.nz Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
