Re: [PATCH 3/6] DCCP: Introduce CCID3 extensions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A style comment - I like the idea of the extensions and can see your point.
To be true, if the code were analysed for extensions then the rfc344bis-00 
extensions would probably also count, as well as the erratum for the SYN
RTT sample.

When using a one-bit flag (which automatically behaves like a Boolean type), 
such as
	/* @ccid3hctx_faster_restart_on: whether Faster Restart is enabled */
	/* ... */
	u8				ccid3hctx_faster_restart_on:1;

the testing and setting code would be smaller - if a little less elegant.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux