Em Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 02:25:27PM +0100, Gerrit Renker escreveu: > Sorry this one has a bug also - it compresses a signed 64 bit quantity into a 32-bit unsigned > value. When re-interpreted as microsecond value (in dccp_sample_rtt), this gives values which > are way too small. > > Maybe we should keep the dccp_epoch thing, but now with ktime_t, so as to avoid large microsecond values? Argh, it seems so :-( > In any case, the RTT sampling is not usable - it constantly produces overflow, since the timestamp > option value is too small. Reading code and RFC now... - Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
