On 7/21/07, Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| OK. I've hacked my iperf version around a bit to get closer to Gerrit's. | | What I've done: | - ported more of his code over | -- renaming/shifting code | -- fix service code handling to allow network byte order and correct name | -- merged using -b option for DCCP (NB gives an error at end but seems | to be working OK) This is an error - you need to support the -b option on the server as well. The reason is that iperf, like ttcp, uses a kind of handshake to terminate datagram test runs. You didn't describe the error - was it something like `did not receive the last ack after 10 tries'? If yes then the code needs to support -b on the server as well. The bandwidth measurements are otherwise not accurate.
Yes it was. That makes sense now.
| | Our code still differs a bit e.g. I don't support UDP Lite yet. Are these the only differences? If yes then I am all for combining one patch and uploading it to the description of regression testing.
Yes it was, apart from I hadn't picked up all your tidyups. -- Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/ Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz WAND Network Research Group - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
