Re: [PATCH-UPDATE]: Changes after retracting timestamping patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You are right, this is an oversight. I wanted to resubmit this patch to the
list anyway, since Dave had some reservations which I think originated from 
the timestamping issue.

The fix is in using dccp_timestamp, as in all other patches I have been updating
over the day. Will send this update shortly.

  
|  I think we should take the timestamp at dccp_v[46]_rcv time, into the
|  skb, that won't be  as precise as
|  skb_get_timestamp+net_enable_timestamp, but at least will eliminate
|  the time the packet sits in the backlog (if it sits at all), no?
|  
I think that this makes not a huge difference. I am preparing an email to
Eddie which says why. Essentially I think that Linux is the wrong platform
for CCID3 anyway, so if this slows down the sender, it may even be better
to keep speed within a controllable range. Many thanks for looking into this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux