Re: [PATCH-UPDATE]: Changes after retracting timestamping patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/13/07, Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Following the earlier discussions of patches, here is the update
after removing the skb_get_timestamp() patches.

OK, starting with the first, how can it be that it honours the initial
exchange if the timestamp is taken now not from the skb timestamp but
at that point in time? I.e. from a quick reading the comment doesn't
make sense anymore, as we're not getting the timestamp taken at packet
arrival, as dccp_timestamp just does a do_gettimeofday.

I think we should take the timestamp at dccp_v[46]_rcv time, into the
skb, that won't be  as precise as
skb_get_timestamp+net_enable_timestamp, but at least will eliminate
the time the packet sits in the backlog (if it sits at all), no?

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux