Re: [PATCH 4/5]: DCCP Fix t_nom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Ian McDonald:
|  I'll look at this when I get a chance (hopefully today).

I will be out in a minute. I have few more things:

 (a) On
     http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/patch-backlog/3c_CCID3_add_more_debugging_McDonald.diff
     I made minor changes (to make the format consistent)

 (b) On my `experimental' patch set I have uploaded the following:
     
     http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/experimental_patches/EXPERIMENTAL_dummy_receiver.diff

     This short-circuits the feedback loop (when working as an electronics engineer,
     opening or short-circuiting was the first method of testing something when there
     was a fault). Using this patch, one can test if the sender `behaves', since the
     receiver practically does not impose inhibitions.

 (c) Thought again about dccp_wait_for_ccid -- is it certain that when the packet is ready
     to be sent (ccid_hc_tx_send_packet returns 0), that it indeed will be sent soon?
     I might ponder this when on holiday B-)

Best wishes
Gerrit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux