Re: [PATCH] configure.ac: drop -Wl,--fatal-warnings

[Alexey Gladkov <legion@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 05:41:43PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 05:55:46PM +0000, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> > 
> > On 16/02/2024 16:33, Fabrice Fontaine wrote:
> > > Drop -Wl,--fatal-warnings with --enable-static to avoid the following
> > > static build failure:
> > > 
> > > configure:4778: checking for strtod
> > > configure:4778: /home/autobuild/autobuild/instance-8/output-1/host/bin/powerpc-buildroot-linux-uclibcspe-gcc -o conftest -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -mabi=spe -mfloat-gprs=single -Wa,-me500 -Os -g0  -static -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -static -Wl,--fatal-warnings conftest.c  >&5
> > > /home/autobuild/autobuild/instance-8/output-1/host/lib/gcc/powerpc-buildroot-linux-uclibcspe/8.4.0/../../../../powerpc-buildroot-linux-uclibcspe/bin/ld: warning: conftest has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions
> > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> > 
> > Where is this warning coming from? Does it show a real problem that needs to
> > be addressed?
> > 
> > As for the actual patch, you're right that configure should not be using
> > -Wl,--fatal-warnings, it should be avoided there for the same reason -Werror
> > should be, the warnings that get promoted to errors differ between toolchain
> > versions and in general, it is not possible to ensure that all valid
> > toolchains, all valid warning flags, result in no warnings.
> > 
> > I suspect though that it was added for a reason, that there were things that
> > *should* cause configure checks to fail, that did not fail except with
> > -Wl,--fatal-warnings. Whatever that reason may have been, it will need to be
> > handled differently if -Wl,--fatal-warnings is dropped. Unfortunately, it
> > was added to dash back in 2007 before the current mailing list existed, so I
> > am having trouble finding any explanation for what those errors may have
> > been.
> > 
> > Dropping it sounds good to me if no one can tell why it is there, but I
> > would suggest some experimentation may be in order to try and figure that
> > out first.
> 
> The patch was sent by Alexey Gladkov back in 2006.  Let's ask him
> to see if he remembers what the -Wl,--fatal-warnings was for?

Oh. It was so long ago. If I'm not mistaken, -Wl,--fatal-warnings was
added to --enable-static because of --with-libedit. But this may be a
false memory. Sorry.

[Thu Oct 4 14:21:44 2007 +0800] 12dc496 "[BUILD] Add --enable-static option to configure."
[Tue May 23 20:52:23 2006 +1000] 13537aa "[BUILD] Added --with-libedit option to configure"

> Thanks,
> -- 
> Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
> PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
> 

-- 
Rgrds, legion