On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:02:41PM +0100, Harald van Dijk wrote: > > Even if csh is intentionally in the "See also" section despite not > being referenced anywhere else, is it also intentional that chsh is > not in that section despite the earlier reference? Would a patch > that leaves csh but also adds chsh be more appropriate, or do you > prefer to leave it as it is now? The see also section is not meant to be an exhaustive list of all commands referred to in the manual. It's meant to be a list of manual entries related to dash. So no I'm not going to add chsh there just because there was an earlier reference. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html