On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Anders Kaseorg wrote: > But if that’s what happened, it seems like a kernel bug to me! > Shouldn’t an open() call only be restarted or return EINTR in the case > that it hasn’t had any side effects yet and can safely be restarted? I submitted a kernel patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134071285509470 Anders -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] Set SA_RESTART flag on SIGCHLD handler
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set SA_RESTART flag on SIGCHLD handler
- From: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:19:36 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: dash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4FE98907.4040507@mit.edu>
- User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Set SA_RESTART flag on SIGCHLD handler
- From: Anders Kaseorg
- Re: [PATCH] Set SA_RESTART flag on SIGCHLD handler
- References:
- [PATCH] Set SA_RESTART flag on SIGCHLD handler
- From: Anders Kaseorg
- Re: [PATCH] Set SA_RESTART flag on SIGCHLD handler
- From: Jonathan Nieder
- Re: [PATCH] Set SA_RESTART flag on SIGCHLD handler
- From: Anders Kaseorg
- Re: [PATCH] Set SA_RESTART flag on SIGCHLD handler
- From: Anders Kaseorg
- [PATCH] Set SA_RESTART flag on SIGCHLD handler
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] fifo: Do not restart open() if it already found a partner
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fifo: Do not restart open() if it already found a partner
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Set SA_RESTART flag on SIGCHLD handler
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Set SA_RESTART flag on SIGCHLD handler
- Index(es):
 |