> Well you know, not the whole world revolves around Linux. Indeed -- the market "revolves" around Windows. The world of the free desktops *does* revolve around Linux. And yes, there are others, which I have used in the past myself (all the BSDs). Any responsible action should take into account the demographics of the user base, not the fondness for certain niches. > And while there are pecularities, writing shell scripts > using IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 as a baseline is a good starting point > for achieving portability since most modern Unix or Unix-like OS Personally I have always strived to do so... > /bin/sh == bash might be common among Linux distros, however in > the real world it is neither a de-facto standard nor guaranteed I know this. As much as you might enjoy it, you're preaching to the choir :) I was **only** arguing that the Debian / Ubuntu transition to dash was premature (for both Debian and dash) and improperly handled. > In the real world software tends to have bugs, other shells have > bugs, too. Given its resources dash is relatively well- > maintained, bugs reported on this list are getting addressed. Eh, not my 2 bugs. One was unanswered by Ubuntu, the other by this very mailing list. I've since encountered several other good bug candidates, but chose to rewrite my scripts and work around errors without digging deeper. What can one do? Even if dash fixes something today, it'll be several years before one can be sure that the old version is flushed out of 90% of the desktops... Now, when you are the default Debian shell, I think the "given its resources" argument should never, ever be opened. Otherwise one would be tempted to ask whether dash is suitable for its role... -- Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html