Jari Ruusu wrote: > Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: >> But i still think that a little "note" about that is appropriate for the >> README, so that other won't fall into the same tarpit as i. :-) > > Following text will be in next version of loop-AES README "Performance > tuning" section: > [deleted] Great. I now know why i fell into this tar pit and you MAY have saved others from falling into the same. :-) Btw. "Performance tuning". You already changed the last paragraph of the (current) chapter? Current 2.6 kernels contain another IO-scheduler and made it default in 2.6.18: CFQ. Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous. - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
