Alle 18:16, sabato 8 ottobre 2005, Jari Ruusu ha scritto: >Why is that 'AMD64_ASM=n' there? Since I've a x86-32 cpu I don't need AMD64 assembler AES and MD5 implementations (is it wrong?) > Can you post output of 'env' and 'cat make_include' commands? Sure: env ############################## TERM=xterm SHELL=/bin/bash OLDPWD=/ USER=root GDK_USE_XFT=1 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11 PWD=/usr/src/util-linux-2.12r PS1=[\t]\u@\h:\w\$ HOME=/root SHLVL=2 LOGNAME=root _=/usr/bin/env ################################## cat make_include ################# VERSION=2.12r CC=cc CFLAGS=-02 LDFLAGS=-s HAVE_UUID=yes HAVE_RAW_H=yes HAVE_NCURSES=yes CURSESFLAGS=-DNCH=1 LIBCURSES=-lncurses HAVE_TERMCAP=yes LIBTERMCAP=-ltermcap NEED_LIBCRYPT=yes FOREIGN = --foreign-user HAVE_XGETTEXT=yes HAVE_OPENPTY=yes HAVE_PIVOT_ROOT=yes HAVE_ZLIB=yes HAVE_BLKID=yes ################################## > This is what 'CFLAGS=-O2 ./configure' says here on debian Sarge: I've sarge too (installed with chroot) and I've installed some needed packages, the actual outuput is now near yours :) : CFLAGS=-02 ./configure configuring util-linux-2.12r You have <scsi/scsi.h> You have <linux/blkpg.h> You have <linux/kd.h> You have <locale.h> You have <langinfo.h> You have <sys/user.h> You have <uuid/uuid.h> You have <rpcsvc/nfs_prot.h> You have <asm/types.h> You have <linux/raw.h> You have <stdint.h> You have <sys/io.h> You have inet_aton() You have fsync() You have getdomainname() You have nanosleep() You have personality() You have updwtmp() You have fseeko() You have lchown() You have rpmatch() You have <term.h> You have ncurses. Using <ncurses.h>. You have termcap You need -lcrypt You have <libintl.h> and gettext() You have __progname You have <pty.h> and openpty() You have wide character support You have SYS_pivot_root You have a tm_gmtoff field in struct tm Your rpcgen output does not compile - using pregenerated code You have zlib You have blkid The problem now is lcrypt and rpcgen and I don't know really how to resolve it. > I believe util-linux package is required for normal operation and > removing it is probably a bad idea. Setting mount package on hold and > replacing few binaries with newer versions works just fine. So, can I replace the singles patched executables (mount, umount, losetup, swapon, swapoff)? Thanks very much for the replay! - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
