On Wed, 12 May 2004, Dan Hollis wrote: > On 12 May 2004, cw.postma@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > [... spam ...] > > Hello, I thought I said the admin should firewall 64.235.50.0/24 ? > > Is this list dead? The list isn't dead, but the admin is horribly overworked and doesn't always have time to read it. I've added the spam sending IP addresses to PSBL, but I suspect the longer term solution is to upgrade nl.linux.org to a spamassassin with SURBL support (and to keep my own SURBL blocklist based on the mail I get to my spamtraps ;)) Rik -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
