Mr. Hospel, et al.: You can ignore the license, its just the idea that people have the nerve to complain that I use outlook, it is so outrageous. I am sorry, but that is the email client I am forced to use as I have many customers which force me to use the calendaring and other functions which are tied to the email. I am sorry, a lot of people on here are Linux bigots, and while I do dearly love Linux, and would like nothing more than to see the day when the entire World replaces Microsoft OSes with Linux, that has not happened as yet, and I am stuck using this software. However, I said that to make a point. To show that these demands and constant harassment as to the software I choose are equally as outrageous. I would far prefer outlook to function as Mr. Harris desires it to, but it doesn't and that is that. If it makes you all feel any better, you can consider the license revoked, but it's the point, that people such chutzpah to tell someone else to change their email client! I DON'T HAVE A CHOICE! I HATE OUTLOOK! I use it because my clients DEMAND it, and I am not resolved to have several email clients in force at one time. Very Respectfully, Stuart Blake Tener, IT3, USNR-R, N3GWG Beverly Hills, California VTU 1904G (Volunteer Training Unit) stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx west coast: (310)-358-0202 P.O. Box 16043, Beverly Hills, CA 90209-2043 east coast: (215)-338-6005 P.O. Box 45859, Philadelphia, PA 19149-5859 Telecopier: (419)-715-6073 fax to email gateway via www.efax.com (it's free!) JOIN THE US NAVY RESERVE, SERVE YOUR COUNTRY, AND BENEFIT FROM IT ALL. Sunday, October 07, 2001 10:11 AM -----Original Message----- From: owner-linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Ton Hospel Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 5:00 AM To: linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: des-cbc In article <NBBBJHKIOKPKOGOEPEDPKECODOAA.stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R" <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Mr. Harris: > > I do not intend to use Microsoft Outlook in any other manner than > its default manner in terms of quoting text. But I will tell you that I > myself do not appreciate the way it functions, and am forced to use it until > Evolution (which I have much hope for) can read ".pst" files, and be > compatible with MS Exchange calendaring functions which I use extensively on > my clients servers. When that functionality exists, I will join you in > cursing Outlook. Doing all the editing involved as you request is simply > just too much work. > > How about this, since my text is my writing, perhaps I ought say > this. I do not place my words in the public domain. I as their author am > choosing to publish them free, while still reserving all redistribution > rights. You sir, are granted a license to redistribute and republish my > words (in a public electronic forum), if each paragraph and sentence is > reproduced in its entirety, and by doing so you grant a full and complete > reciprocal license to do so with your words. I do not care where between Could we please have this guy removed from the mailinglist ? His quoting style has always been terrible, but i never considered it worth protesting about. But now he is basically declaring it illegal to have his posts archived (his license does not allow that (yet ?), and trying to put implicit restrictions on the way you are allowed to answer him. Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
