Mr. Babcock: I thought the message was MIME compliant cause I checked and all the right boxes were ticked off!?! To many complainers on this list, not enough doers. What are "TAI dates"? Very Respectfully, Stuart Blake Tener, IT3, USNR-R, N3GWG Beverly Hills, California VTU 1904G (Volunteer Training Unit) stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx west coast: (310)-358-0202 P.O. Box 16043, Beverly Hills, CA 90209-2043 east coast: (215)-338-6005 P.O. Box 45859, Philadelphia, PA 19149-5859 Telecopier: (419)-715-6073 fax to email gateway via www.efax.com (it's free!) JOIN THE US NAVY RESERVE, SERVE YOUR COUNTRY, AND BENEFIT FROM IT ALL. Thursday, August 02, 2001 7:30 AM -----Original Message----- From: owner-linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael T. Babcock Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 11:08 AM To: linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Those damn army brats! > a. This is totally OT for this list Probably very true. > b. You're not using MIME attachments, but proprietary Windows stuff. If > you want us to even look at it, use MIME. Yes, actually, his message was perfectly MIME compliant. Read the source. > c. All 32bit-time_t Unices will stop working properly in 2038. That's > due to the way they internally store the time (in secs since 1-1-1970 > 0:00 GMT). So anything resembling Y3K testing is completely bogus > anyway. You haven't dealt with TAI dates yet? Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ â?ì\¯*m¡Êò¦Ú ªaÊ)Ú?Ú'¶??{±³+-z`+r¯zm§ÿæj)g?X§»+?ùb?ì\¯*m£
