Re: Ciphers which may sleep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 06:55:58PM +0100, Alexander S A Kjeldaas wrote:

>  3) A work-queue w/callback one.  You want this when dealing with the
> network stack.  You don't care about processes.

yes, indeed. We're certainly going to need this in the long run.

> ciphers optional.  Currently I feel that all three interfaces should
> be supported.  Off the top of my head - something like:

now this sounds like a really nice proposal. This should be flexible 
enough to cover all practical scenarios.

> astor

-- 
Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte / laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx                http://www.gnumonks.org
============================================================================
GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M- 
V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t++ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ DI? !D G+ e* h+ r% y+(*)

Linux-crypto:  cryptography in and on the Linux system
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Linux Crypto]     [Gnu Crypto]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux