"IT3 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR-R" wrote: > I understand that their implementation is inclusive of a > "plugin" type of style for adding features. Would it be okay if I asked > them to review the code you have written to see if they could adapt it > to be a plug in for EVMS in the future (i.e. adapt loop-aes for EVMS)? > Of course, I am not sure (but I presume) that this is the sensible way > to implement a mix of these technologies. loop-AES and cryptoapi's cryptoloop are stacking devices and they can be used on top of EVMS or LVM just fine. No need to shoehorn them into EVMS. Regards, Jari Ruusu <jari.ruusu@pp.inet.fi> - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
