On 15 April 2014 02:38, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The cpufreq core supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper
> for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it.
>
> It should have no functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index 000e4e0..12a5750 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static unsigned extract_io(u32 value, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
>
> static unsigned extract_msr(u32 msr, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
> {
> - int i;
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
> struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
>
> if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
> @@ -223,11 +223,11 @@ static unsigned extract_msr(u32 msr, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
>
> perf = data->acpi_data;
>
> - for (i = 0; data->freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
> - if (msr == perf->states[data->freq_table[i].driver_data].status)
> - return data->freq_table[i].frequency;
> + cpufreq_for_each_entry(pos, data->freq_table) {
> + if (msr == perf->states[pos->driver_data].status)
> + return pos->frequency;
> }
> - return data->freq_table[0].frequency;
> + return data->freq_table->frequency;
This isn't a related change, isn't it? Also it make it less readable.
So probably
just leave it as is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
