On 19/12/13 14:16, Anson Huang wrote: > This device tree binding document describes the imx6 cpufreq > DT bindings. This document lists all required and optional properties > for imx6 cpufreq. > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <b20788@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-imx6.txt | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-imx6.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-imx6.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-imx6.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..a14b895 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-imx6.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ > +i.MX6 cpufreq driver > +------------------- > + > +i.MX6 SoC cpufreq driver for CPU frequency scaling. > + > +This binding doc defines properties that must be put in the /cpus/cpu@0 node, > +please refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt > +for detail. > + > +Required properties: > +- operating-points: Refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/opp.txt > + for details. > +- clocks: Specify clocks that need to be used when cpu frequency is scaled, > + refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt for > + details. > +- clock-names: List of clock input name strings sorted in the same order as the > + clocks property, refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt > + for details. > +- xxx-supply: Input voltage supply regulator, refer to > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt for details. > + arm-supply: regulator node supplying arm. > + pu-supply: regulator node supplying pu. > + soc-supply: regulator node supplying soc. > + > +Optional properties: > +- fsl,soc-operating-points: Specify vddsoc/pu voltage settings that must > + go with cpu0's operating-points. > +- clock-latency: Specify the possible maximum transition latency for clock, > + in unit of nanoseconds. > + Sorry if I am missing something obvious as I have not followed the previous versions and corresponding comments. Should these SoC properties be part of cpu node ? If so which cpu or why cpu0 ? IIUC it's more a SoC properties which also influences ARM CPU OPPs. IOW other regulators may depend on pu/soc-supply. In that case it would be cleaner if that dependency is setup through regulators framework. > +Examples: > + > + cpu@0 { > + operating-points = < > + /* kHz uV */ > + 1200000 1275000 > + 996000 1250000 > + 792000 1150000 > + 396000 975000 > + >; > + fsl,soc-operating-points = < > + /* ARM kHz SOC-PU uV */ > + 1200000 1275000 > + 996000 1250000 > + 792000 1175000 > + 396000 1175000 > + >; > + clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */ > + clocks = <&clks 104>, <&clks 6>, <&clks 16>, > + <&clks 17>, <&clks 170>; > + clock-names = "arm", "pll2_pfd2_396m", "step", > + "pll1_sw", "pll1_sys"; > + arm-supply = <®_arm>; > + pu-supply = <®_pu>; > + soc-supply = <®_soc>; > + }; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html