On 20 September 2013 18:08, Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote: > I am open to suggestions if any one feels we can improve this better. I didn't really had one.. I thought of pm_opp** instead of dev_pm_opp** though.. > I believe that change was from Patch #2[1] Yeah.. I just replied on a single patch :) > yes, you are right, I had squashed this patch in to squelch checkpatch > warnings: I see.. > I had added a comment: > " Minor checkpatch warning fixes as a result of this change was fixed as > well." I really missed that.. > Would you suggest I split the change off to a separate patch or improve > the comment a little more? don't really know, maybe leave those as is and let checkpatch warn you.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
