On 09/12/2013 12:22 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 12 September 2013 12:16, Srivatsa S. Bhat > <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Of course, if we change the suspend/resume sequence and that fixes this, that >> would be like getting it for free, nobody would say no to it ;-) > > Not really :) > > Policy with 4 CPUs, 0,1,2,3, policy->cpu currently set to 1, 2 or 3... > > We will remove CPUs in order 3,2,1 and add back in 1,2,3... Or Vice Versa > > policy->cpu after resume is 0 :) > Ah, great counter-example! :-) Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
