On 12 September 2013 12:16, Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Of course, if we change the suspend/resume sequence and that fixes this, that > would be like getting it for free, nobody would say no to it ;-) Not really :) Policy with 4 CPUs, 0,1,2,3, policy->cpu currently set to 1, 2 or 3... We will remove CPUs in order 3,2,1 and add back in 1,2,3... Or Vice Versa policy->cpu after resume is 0 :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
