On 16 July 2013 17:36, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:11:54 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx > wrote, >> On 4 July 2013 14:20, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > +void cpufreq_set_boost_enabled(int state) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [*] > >> >> Maybe cpufreq_block_boost? As suggested by Rafael. > > What do you mean by cpufreq_block_boost()? This name would reverse the > logic. > > Function [*] is used to change boost_enabled static flag (defined at > cpufreq.c file) state according to acpi-cpufreq.c boost support status. I misread it again :( So, what about adding another field in struct cpufreq_driver: boost_enabled? And get rid of the global boost_enabled we have used? Similar to how boost_supported is used, then we don't need this routine. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
