On Monday, June 24, 2013 04:40:27 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24 June 2013 16:29, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > In your original series that patch was the last one. What made you change your > > mind and put it in front? > > I initially thought that this one would break git bisect (code would > compile, but would fail) for platforms whose code I have fixed in > this patchset. > > But that is true only for failure cases, otherwise code would work as > normal. > > And hence kept this at the top this time. Well, it should go last. Also I'd prefer to apply it directly. Please check my comment in there too. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html