On Monday, June 24, 2013 04:12:29 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 16:19, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Monday, June 24, 2013 11:20:35 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >>
> >> This is part of my patchset "CPUFreq: Fix {PRE|POST}CHANGE notification
> >> sequence". It contains changes specific to cpufreq core and ARM drivers.
> >>
> >> I have left changes to non-ARM cpufreq drivers from this pull request. See if
> >> you can take them for 3.11.
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit 9e895ace5d82df8929b16f58e9f515f6d54ab82d:
> >>
> >> Linux 3.10-rc7 (2013-06-22 09:47:31 -1000)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>
> >> git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-fix-notification-arm
> >>
> >> for you to fetch changes up to f2d65dd0d573e6961165f0be35bac84997b9e707:
> >
> > Well, this contains changes that aren't specific to ARM as far as I can say.
>
> Yeah, the first patch touches core. How do you want to proceed with this one
> then? You will apply them from mail? Or you will apply first patch (core cpufreq
> one) and I should send pull request without it?
In your original series that patch was the last one. What made you change your
mind and put it in front?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
