On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 09:39:38 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Change subject to: "cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core"
>
> Ok.
>
> >
> > On 11 June 2013 14:33, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This commit adds support for software based frequency boosting.
> >
> > No. It adds support for both software and hardware boosting. So just
> > write: This commit adds boost frequency support in cpufreq core
> > (Hardware & Software).
>
> Ok.
> >
> > > Some SoC (like Exynos4 - e.g. 4x12) allow setting frequency above
> > > its normal condition limits. Such a change shall be only done for a
> > > short
> >
> > s/condition/operation
> > s/change/mode
> > s/done/used
> >
>
> Ok.
>
> > > time.
> > >
> > > Overclocking (boost) support is essentially provided by platform
> > > dependent cpufreq driver.
> > >
> > > This commit unifies support for SW and HW (Intel) over clocking
> > > solutions in the core cpufreq driver. Previously the "boost" sysfs
> > > attribute was defined at acpi driver code.
> > > By default boost is disabled. One global attribute is available at:
> > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost.
> >
> > Enter a blank line here.
>
> Ok
>
> >
> > > It only shows up when cpufreq driver supports overclocking.
> > > Under the hood frequencies dedicated for boosting are marked with a
> > > special flag (CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ) at driver's frequency table.
> > > It is the user's concern to enable/disable overclocking with proper
> > > call to sysfs.
> >
> > Good.
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > ---
> ^^^^
> [*] this --- was added manually by me.
>
> > > Changes for v2:
> > > - Removal of cpufreq_boost structure and move its fields to
> > > cpufreq_driver structure
> > > - Flag to indicate if global boost attribute is already defined
> > > - Extent the pr_{err|debbug} functions to show current function
> > > names ---
> >
> > You don't have to manually add "---" here. Just keep a blank line
> > instead.
>
> One "---" is added by git automatically. The [*] was added to distinct
> the changelog from rest of the commit. At least older versions of GIT
> required this to not include changelog to commit messages.
Which doesn't matter anyway. None of them will show up in git log, so don't
worry. :-)
[...]
>
> > And so we must have used
> > boost_en here.
>
> boost_en has two meanings:
> 0 - either boost disabled or not supported (when low_level_boost=NULL).
> 1 - boost is enabled.
Gosh, please don't do that. Use *two* flags, one meaning "supported" and the
second meaning "enabled".
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
