On 05/14/2013 07:46 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
...
> This must address your concerns:
> @Rafael: I have attached both patches now for you to apply.
>
> From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:08:50 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: tegra: Remove irrelevant comment
>
> Tegra cpufreq driver doesn't use .index field of cpufreq_frequency_table and so
> comment mentioning order of .index is irrelevant. Remove it.
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
> -/* Frequency table index must be sequential starting at 0 */
> static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
> { 0, 216000 },
> { 1, 312000 },
Does the .index/.data field even need to be filled in any more?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
