On 05/13/2013 06:57 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> "Index" field of struct cpufreq_frequency_table was never index and isn't used
> at all by cpufreq core. And is only useful for cpufreq drivers for their
> personal use.
>
> Many people now a days blindly set it in ascending order with the assumption
> that core is using it for some work.
>
> This patch renames it to "data" as that's what its purpose it. All users of the
> same are fixed too.
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
> -/* Frequency table index must be sequential starting at 0 */
> +/* Frequency table data must be sequential starting at 0 */
I assume that comment is due to the assumption you're trying to remove.
Should the comment be removed/corrected now? Perhaps the .data field
isn't even needed any more in this driver?
> static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
> { 0, 216000 },
> { 1, 312000 },
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
