On Monday, April 08, 2013 06:15:09 PM Kukjin Kim wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based > > on > > > > for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff > > so this > > > > should be sent to upstream via samsung tree. > > > > > > Hmm... Its already applied in Rafael's tree. But it doesn't mean that > > > it can't be > > > moved to your tree if there is a issue. > > > > Well, I'm dropping it. Please merge via the Samsung tree. > > > OK, I will. > > I got patch file from Viresh, and there is a sign from Rafael, > but it should be ack. So Rafael, let me use your ack on this patch when > I apply. If any problems, please let me know. Since it was signed-off by me before, you can assume it's been ACKed as well. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
