On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on > > for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this > > should be sent to upstream via samsung tree. > > Hmm... Its already applied in Rafael's tree. But it doesn't mean that > it can't be > moved to your tree if there is a issue. Well, I'm dropping it. Please merge via the Samsung tree. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
