On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8 April 2013 14:17, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 8 April 2013 13:47, Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm >>> index f3f3b14..bce2195 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm >>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm >>> @@ -42,6 +42,15 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ >>> This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS5250 >>> SoC. >>> >>> +config ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ >>> + def_bool SOC_EXYNOS5440 >>> + depends on HAVE_CLK && PM_OPP && OF >> >> Don't you need a depend on your Soc or mach or arch? Don't send another >> version for this now.. Just send a new patch over this patchset. > > Sorry, i overlooked def_bool... This comments stands invalid. Ok, I resend this patch addressing all comments. Thanks, Amit > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
