On Sunday, March 31, 2013 07:00:16 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 31 March 2013 03:38, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > OK, I'll remove it. > > Thanks. > > > And by the way, I'm no longer amused with the mess going on in the cpufreq land. > > > > Please send me *patches*. I'm not interested in git pointers. > > Hmm. > > > Moreover, please send those patches in a way allowing me to figure out the > > ordering without looking into your git tree. > > Yes, i was planning to do so. > > > If you have a number of outstanding cpufreq patches for me to apply, please > > create a patch series out of them and send it. > > Do you mean, i should merge all stuff i have queued up for 3.10 in a > single patchset? > Like for-3.10? Will do. Yes, thanks. But the patches moving cpufreq drivers into drivers/cpufreq from somewhere else need each an ACK from the maintainer of that other place. I won't take any patches like that without AKCs. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
