Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22 March 2013 17:41, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, if the submitter wants to cheat, she/he certainly can this way, but
> what's the benefit, honestly?  If the reviewer actually notices that there are
> more differences than the submitter admits to, the consequences may be quite
> unpleasant for the submitter (like the rejection of any future patches, for
> example).  And mistakes are possible anyway (and the more patches you deal
> with, the greater the chances of making a mistake are).

Agreed.. I was focusing on the last part: mistakes.. People learn over time
and can still commit mistakes.. So a diff is always better to see what changed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux