On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday, March 22, 2013 07:50:54 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Hmm... I always thought fixups are way easy to review (and i still >> believe that's >> true) as they just contain what got changed and so people don't have to review >> whole patch again. > > They won't have to if you write in the preamble what the differences from > previous versions are. You didn't get me.. How will the reviewer check if author has done what he is saying in preamble and he hasn't broken anything new? >> BUT people who are looking for complete patches to apply >> would be annoyed by this and hence i always show them path of my repo >> where they can find it. > > The problem with this approach is that the complete patches never make it to > the mailing lists and people have problems with connecting commits to > previously posted patches. > > Moreover, it is *much* more convenient to me to take patches from kernel.org > patchwork than from your repos, with all due respect. I understand.. I push them to repo only when they are broken, otherwise not. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
