On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 11:59:57 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 16 December 2012 19:07, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 16 December 2012 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Well, this series makes sense to me, but I'd like to hear what the other people > >> think. > > > > That sounds great :) > > > > Some more information for others about how i reached to these issues > > is present here: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/44 > > Hmm.. I don't know, if we are going to get any feedback from others :( Surely somebody cares except for us two? > BTW, i consider them as fixes and so would make sense to get them in next rc. > What do you think? Yes, if somebody tells me "yes, this fixes a problem for me". Otherwise, I don't quite see the reason. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
