On 16 December 2012 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sunday, December 16, 2012 11:20:08 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> cpufreq core doesn't manage offline cpus and if driver->init() has returned >> mask including offline cpus, it may result in unwanted behavior by cpufreq core >> or governors. >> >> We need to get only online cpus in this mask. There are two places to fix this >> mask, cpufreq core and cpufreq driver. It makes sense to do this at common place >> and hence is done in core. > > Well, this series makes sense to me, but I'd like to hear what the other people > think. That sounds great :) Some more information for others about how i reached to these issues is present here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/44 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
