On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:35:49AM -0600, Mark Langsdorf wrote: > The function is buried pretty deep in the cpufreq_stat code. It didn't > seem appropriate to make it a function pointer as part of struct > cpufreq_driver. Right, what's cpufreq-speak for if (Calxeda) shift by 10 ? Better yet, add a flag or a bitfield called "minimize_jitter" or similar and set it only on your hardware... Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
