On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:24:56PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > >>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c > >>> index 5467879..7cfb516 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c > >>> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > >>> > >>> cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(exynos_info->freq_table, policy->cpu); > >>> > >>> + locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0); > >>> + > >>> /* set the transition latency value */ > >>> policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 100000; > > Any concerns with this patch? it's in my queue for applying to -next. I'll clear everything out today. Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
