Hi Dave, On 02/09/2012 10:12 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: > Ping > > On 02/01/2012 04:38 PM, Tushar Behera wrote: >> Ping >> >> On 01/25/2012 10:15 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: >>> As per definition, locking_frequency is the initial frequency which is >>> set by boot-loader. Hence the value is updated with the initial value >>> during boot time init call. >>> >>> This code was present in exynos210-cpufreq.c before this consolidation >>> patch. >>> - a125a17fa61a ([CPUFREQ] EXYNOS: Make EXYNOS common cpufreq driver). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> The patch is based on v3.3-rc1. >>> >>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 2 ++ >>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c >>> index 5467879..7cfb516 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c >>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c >>> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) >>> >>> cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(exynos_info->freq_table, policy->cpu); >>> >>> + locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0); >>> + >>> /* set the transition latency value */ >>> policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 100000; >>> >> >> > > Any concerns with this patch? -- Tushar Behera -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
