On 12/18/11 17:03, Richard Zhao wrote: > > Do you have to patch to implement per-cpu udelay? In current code, udelay uses > global loops_per_jiffy. > > We've been carrying forward the timer based udelay patches. They're in the patch tracker as 6873/1, 6874/1, and 6875/1. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html