On 12/16/2011 02:52 AM, Jamie Iles wrote: > >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, l_p_j_ref); >> +static unsigned long l_p_j_ref_freq; >> + >> +static struct clk *cpu_clk; > > This assumes that all CPU's share the same clk and run at the same rate. > Is that a fair/safe assumption? I honestly don't know the answer to > this so it's just a question!!! On MSM, cpus independently scale both frequency and voltage. Our clock driver isn't upstream yet. David Brown has a preliminary version here: https://www.codeaurora.org/gitweb/quic/kernel/?p=davidb/linux-msm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/msm-clock-rfc Once we get our driver upstream, MSM will be an exception and not select ARM_GENERIC_CPUFREQ. We'll probably have a separate msm-cpufreq.c driver under drivers/cpufreq/. - Bryan -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
