On Friday 17 June 2011 13:12:56 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > I think new cpufreq drivers should live in drivers/cpufreq, not in arch/. > > We've > > started moving other drivers away from arch/x86 and arch/arm already. > > What about drivers/cpufreq/powerpc, or it's an unnecessary? drivers/cpufreq is fine by itself, unless Dave has some preference. > Should I resumbit it, or there will be massive arch/powerpc -> > drivers/cpufreq move? My recommendation would be to submit the new driver for drivers/cpufreq directly and let Ben take care of the others at a convenient time. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
