Hello, On 6/17/11, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday 17 June 2011 10:49:16 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >> Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation >> kit and others). Driver is based on a cpufreq driver for 64-bit powermac >> boxes with all pmac-dependant features removed and simple cleanup >> applied. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_64.S | 4 +- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig | 8 + >> arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/Makefile | 1 + >> arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/cpufreq.c | 317 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 328 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/cpufreq.c >> > > > I think new cpufreq drivers should live in drivers/cpufreq, not in arch/. > We've > started moving other drivers away from arch/x86 and arch/arm already. What about drivers/cpufreq/powerpc, or it's an unnecessary? Should I resumbit it, or there will be massive arch/powerpc -> drivers/cpufreq move? -- With best wishes Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
